← All stock verdicts

Stock verdict · Screened September 2026

Is Fortis (FTS) Halal?

Verdict: No — Fortis fails Shariah screening as of September 2026. The business (regulated electric and gas utilities) is perfectly fine; the balance sheet is not. Debt is ~94% of market cap against a 33% ceiling — nearly triple the limit — because regulated utilities fund their rate base with debt by design. Zoya independently agrees. Below: the full screening math, the dividend question, and what to hold instead.

FAIL
Non-compliant (September 2026). Fails the debt-ratio screen: ~94% total debt to market cap against the 33% ceiling. The business itself is halal — utilities fail this screen by design. This is a screening result, not a fatwa.

Screen 1: Business activity — passes

Fortis is a diversified North American regulated electric and gas utility holding company based in St. John's, Newfoundland — ten utility operations (ITC transmission, UNS Energy, Central Hudson, FortisBC Energy, FortisAlberta, FortisBC Electric, Newfoundland Power, Maritime Electric, Caribbean Utilities) serving ~3.5M customers across five Canadian provinces, ten U.S. states, and the Cayman Islands, on ~C$12B of 2025 revenue. No banking or insurance, no alcohol, gambling, pork, weapons, tobacco, or entertainment — the business screen passes outright.

Screen 2: Financial ratios — where it fails

AAOIFI-style screening applies three ratio tests:

RatioFortis (Sept 2026)CeilingResult
Total debt ÷ market cap≈94% (C$35.98B debt on C$38.34B market cap)< 33%FAIL
Cash + interest-bearing securities ÷ market cap≈ 1.0% (C$384M cash; no securities line disclosed)< 33%PASS
Non-compliant income ÷ total revenue0.35% (C$43M interest income on C$12.17B FY2025 revenue, per Zoya)< 5%PASS

Figures in CAD: Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) for debt and cash; FY2025 for revenue and interest income (per Zoya's published breakdown); market data late September 2026 (FTS.TO C$74.69). Interest-bearing securities are not separately disclosed; treating them as ~$0, cash alone is 1.0% — and even including all "other assets" (C$1,829M) the ratio stays at 5.8%, still passing. Fortis also fails the FTSE variant (debt ÷ total assets: C$35.98B ÷ C$78.76B = 45.7%).

This is structural, not cyclical — Fortis fails this screen by design. Regulated utilities earn their returns on a rate base funded with debt; leverage isn't a phase, it's the business model. At ~94% against a 33% ceiling — nearly triple the limit — no methodology variant closes the gap. Quarterly earnings don't move this verdict; the capital structure is the verdict.

Why there's no screener disagreement here. At ~94% against a 33% ceiling, no methodology variant, market-cap averaging choice, or data-vendor difference closes the gap. Zoya independently rates FTS non-compliant as of September 2026 — and notes its dividends are "not considered halal because the stock is currently not Shariah-compliant." The math agrees.

Screen 3: Purification — doesn't apply

Purification is for compliant holdings that earn small, incidental amounts of non-compliant income. It does not apply to a non-compliant holding: you don't purify a prohibited position, you don't hold it. Fortis's dividend — all 50+ years of increases — can't be "purified" into permissibility.

"But the dividend…"

This is the real reason the question gets asked. Fortis is a Canadian Dividend Aristocrat with 50+ consecutive years of dividend increases — one of the most beloved income stocks in the country, and a fixture of conservative Canadian portfolios. The screening answer doesn't dispute any of that; it just points out that the screen is about the balance sheet, not the payout. Five decades of rising dividends funded by a company carrying ~94% debt-to-market-cap doesn't become halal because it's reliable.

What to hold instead

If Fortis was your Canadian income anchor, the halal replacements aren't another leveraged utility — they're screened equities and halal ETFs:

What could change the verdict

Honestly: almost nothing short of a different industry. Regulated utilities are leveraged by design — Fortis would need to cut roughly two-thirds of its debt, which would mean abandoning the business model that generates its returns. This is the most structural FAIL in the database. We still re-check on our quarterly cadence and will update this page if the capital structure ever changes materially.

FAQ

Is Fortis halal to invest in?

As of September 2026: no. Fortis's business (regulated utilities) is fine, but its debt ratio is ~94% of market cap against the 33% ceiling — nearly triple the limit. Zoya independently rates FTS non-compliant. This is a screening result, not a religious ruling.

It's just electricity and gas — how can it fail?

The business passes; the balance sheet fails. Shariah screening has two independent gates: a prohibited-industry check and financial-ratio checks. Fortis clears the first but carries ~C$36B in debt against a ~C$38B market cap. Regulated utilities are leveraged by design — that's exactly what the ratio screen catches.

Fortis has raised its dividend for 50+ years — doesn't that matter?

To the screen, no. The screen is about the balance sheet, not the payout — five decades of rising dividends funded by ~94% debt-to-market-cap doesn't become halal because it's reliable. Zoya explicitly notes Fortis's dividends are 'not considered halal because the stock is currently not Shariah-compliant.'

Zoya says not compliant — what specifically fails?

The debt ratio. Zoya's published breakdown shows only C$43M of interest income on C$12.17B revenue (0.35% — passing), and the business is clean. It's the ~94% debt-to-market-cap that fails, and our independent math from Fortis's Q2 2026 statements agrees.

Can I purify Fortis's dividends and keep holding?

No — purification applies to compliant holdings with incidental non-compliant income, not to non-compliant holdings. The standard guidance for a stock that fails screening is not to hold it.

I already own FTS shares. What should I do?

The common guidance in screening methodologies is to exit the position. Scholars differ on timing — immediately vs. waiting to avoid a loss — and on how to handle dividends already received. Those are personal-ruling questions for a qualified scholar, not for a website. Don't offset other gains against the position, and re-screen whatever you replace it with.

Affiliate disclosure. This page contains no affiliate links, and the site currently earns no affiliate revenue; commissions never influence our scores or rankings, and every product is Shariah-screened before review. Nothing on this site is financial advice — facts and screening methodology only, no fatwas.